Legal Document
Accessibility Statement
What has been tested, what has been found, and what has not been tested at all.
279 words · about 2 minutes- AWhat has been done2 clauses
- BWhat has not been done3 clauses
- CTelling us1 clause
What has been done
Contrast is computed, not eyeballed
Every text element on every route is measured against the ground it actually renders on, in both colour schemes, with translucent layers composited. The most recent sweep covered 88 routes and 2,176 text elements with no result below the AA threshold.
The measurement runs against the built application rather than the stylesheet, because the defect it exists to catch — a colour valid on one ground used on the other — is invisible in the source.
Structure
- Headings are ordered and not skipped.
- Keyboard focus is always visible.
- Motion respects a reduced-motion preference.
- No control depends on colour alone to carry its meaning.
- Numeric columns are set in tabular figures so they align.
What has not been done
Stated because an accessibility statement that lists only successes is marketing.
No assistive-technology testing
The platform has not been tested with a screen reader by a person who uses one. Semantics have been written with care and verified in an accessibility tree, which is not the same thing and should not be reported as though it were.
No audit by a third party
No independent accessibility audit has been commissioned. The results above are our own measurements.
Known gaps
- Long financial tables scroll horizontally on narrow screens; no alternative view is offered yet.
- The commitment control requires a sustained press, which is a barrier for some motor impairments. A non-timed alternative is not yet built.
- Documents are rendered as pages rather than offered as tagged files.
Telling us
If something here blocks you, write to access@getawaycollective.co. A barrier reported is answered within five working days with either a fix or a date.